Same Streets
← All stories

The Great Port Townsend Customs Scandal

A federal grand jury uncovers a decade-long scheme of extortion and record-tampering at the Port Townsend custom house, where officials pocketed fees and forced local shipping firms to play along.

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

PORT TOWNSEND, April 11. The United States grand jury came into court at 4 p.m., and Foreman Latimer handed Judge Hanford a big batch of documents. The men indicted are Herbert F. Beecher, Quincy A. Brooks and William Harned. The indictments are based on irregularities in the custom-house books. The investigation revealed that for over ten years, the custom house systematically charged illegal fees on shipping, pocketing the difference. Collectors issued 'white receipts' instead of the government's official 'blue receipts' to mask overcharges. For instance, a tug might be charged $2.85 for clearance, but a white receipt would be issued for $3.15, with the difference pocketed by the officers and divided into a pool. The records for Harned’s regime and part of Beecher’s term have been destroyed. United States District Attorney White noted that the expose was made possible by expert examiner J.L. Bynum, whose work allowed for a clean break from the scandals that had long tainted the office.

“For every payment made to the collector... he is required to give a receipt on blanks furnished by the government. These are printed on blue paper... But the Port Townsend custom house, except in rare instances, never issued these blue receipts.”

— Printed in The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1889
Then · 1889137 years apartNow · 2026

This 1889 corruption scandal mirrors the persistent tensions between federal oversight and local economic interests in Pacific Northwest ports. Much like modern debates over port infrastructure and transit, the story highlights how local 'shipping interests' often prioritized operational efficiency—even under corrupt management—over transparency and law.

The original page

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1889-04-12. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, APR 12, 1889, Page 1
Rights
Public domain
Place
48.11339, -122.76189 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗