Same Streets
← All stories

The Bridge at the Commissioner's Back Door

A group of settlers in the White River Valley accuses a King County commissioner of misusing taxpayer money to build a bridge near his own property, ignoring the needs of the actual traveling public.

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

The undersigned have learned that the Commissioners of King County have ignored the petition of the citizens of upper White River for a bridge across White River at T. M. Alvord’s, said petition having been signed by over one hundred and thirty taxpayers. Having learned further that in disregard of the public interest, and in the special interest of one of the said commissioners and thirteen other settlers, they have undertaken to build a bridge across said river at a point a little below the Catholic church on William Cochrane’s place, we therefore desire to appeal to the taxpayers of King County to the end that said scheme may be defeated and the bridge located and built where it will do the most good to the greatest number. We assert that a bridge at Alvord’s would accommodate twenty households to one where the proposed site would be selected; and that the bridge at Alvord’s would be on the direct line of travel to Seattle. The location selected by the commissioners is on the land of William Cochrane, five miles distant from the site generally favored, and far removed from any road. It is not difficult to find the reason for this action. Unfortunately, one of the members of the board of County Commissioners is a man named Julius M. Mors. He resides on White River near the site selected by the commissioners for the bridge, and it is to satisfy his desire to increase the value of his land and make easier his journeys to Seattle that the County Commissioners propose to deflect the line of travel, inconvenience and injure a large portion of the people of the county, and throw one thousand dollars out of the County Treasury.

“It is to satisfy his desire to increase the value of his land and make easier his journeys to Seattle that the County Commissioners propose to deflect the line of travel.”

— Printed in Seattle Daily Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, W.T. [Wash.]) 1881-1888, 1887
Then · 1887139 years apartNow · 2026

This 1887 report on 'bridge-to-nowhere' cronyism mirrors modern Seattle’s ongoing struggles with transit planning and land use, where major public infrastructure projects are often scrutinized for how they benefit property owners and political insiders rather than the public at large.

The original page

Seattle Daily Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, W.T. [Wash.]) 1881-1888, 1887-06-15. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
Seattle Daily Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, W.T. [Wash.]) 1881-1888, JUN 15, 1887, Page 2
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.29503, -122.21310 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗