Same Streets
← All stories

The Unseen Labor of a Household

A spicy letter from a 'Little Worker' challenges a farm editor’s complaints about the difficulty of finding domestic help.

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

We are in receipt of a long letter from a lady who signs herself 'Little Worker,' about our 'hunt for a hired girl.' Little Worker thinks housekeepers are too much like the old Missouri farmer who was looking for a hired man, that had his men quit work at half-past seven, and, after supper, all they had to do was feed the stock, cut some wood, mow some grain, milk the cows, and a dozen other things, enough to make up half a day’s work after hours, and that 'girls are overworked and underpaid that do housework.' She wants to know what on earth makes a man’s time worth more than a woman’s, and why not pay the women as much as the men—'and then you will get plenty of help.' This little spicy writer then wants to know why pay a man on the farm twenty-six dollars a month who does nothing but eat, doesn't get to work except with his jaws before seven and quits at six, and lays around the rest of the day smoking, and then ask a girl to work more hours for a day, more days for a month, and closer application when at work, for about half the wages paid the man. It is to be confessed we feel somewhat demolished, and would suggest that perhaps some drowsy bachelor would take up the cudgel (pen) and hurl a thunderbolt against 'Little Worker' in defense of his much abused sex. As for ourselves, we are still looking for the hired girl.

“What on earth makes a man’s time worth more than a woman’s, and why not pay the women as much as the men—and then you will get plenty of help.”

— Printed in Seattle Daily Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, W.T. [Wash.]) 1881-1888, 1887
Then · 1887139 years apartNow · 2026

This 1888 exchange captures the same structural tension as modern 'labor shortages' in the service sector. The 'Little Worker's' argument—that the problem isn't a lack of workers, but an unwillingness to pay fair wages for domestic labor—remains a core point of contention in Seattle’s current cost-of-living and housing debates.

The original page

Seattle Daily Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, W.T. [Wash.]) 1881-1888, 1887-09-25. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
Seattle Daily Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, W.T. [Wash.]) 1881-1888, SEP 25, 1887, Page 3
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.18490, -122.29214 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗