Same Streets
← All stories

The Juror Who Held Out for a Payday

A Seattle jury stalled a verdict for hours, leading to the dramatic arrest of a man accused of dragging out deliberations just to secure extra witness fees.

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

In the case of A. Orth against N. Stein, recently tried in the District Court, the jury retired at 4:30 o'clock in the afternoon and did not agree upon a verdict until 8 o'clock the following morning. There were whispers abroad that the jury had agreed upon a verdict long before, but stood 'hung' for hours. Yesterday morning, eleven of the jurors—James W. Eaton, R. Dillon, O. G. Hinman, C. K. Carleton, Otto Smith, Jake Bolman, H. Landwort, Dan Kelly, L. W. Wilson, G. W. Scott, and O. W. Wall—presented a complaint to Chief Justice Jones. They stated that one of their brother jurors, W. W. Kaster, had stood out against the other eleven and refused to reason with them. From the taking of the second or third ballot, Kaster told them that the ballot he had cast would be the same through the night, and they believed his reason was to receive an extra day's pay. At the break of day, just prior to being informed that breakfast would be ready in twenty minutes, he then stated of his own accord that he would then cast a ballot with them. Eleven jurors signed the complaint. Chief Justice Jones issued a warrant for the arrest of W. W. Kaster for contempt of court, charging misbehavior and willful neglect of duty. Kaster was brought into court, where he was allowed to give his own recognizance in the sum of $250 to appear to answer the charge himself.

“They truly believe that his reason for so standing out was to receive an extra day's pay.”

— Printed in Seattle Daily Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, W.T. [Wash.]) 1881-1888, 1887
Then · 1887139 years apartNow · 2026

While jury duty is a civic staple today, this 1887 incident highlights the historic frustrations regarding witness and juror compensation, a persistent issue as local courts continue to struggle with balancing juror livelihood against judicial efficiency.

The original page

Seattle Daily Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, W.T. [Wash.]) 1881-1888, 1887-09-29. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
Seattle Daily Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, W.T. [Wash.]) 1881-1888, SEP 29, 1887, Page 3
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.60323, -122.33028 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗