The Price of Poaching in the Bering Sea
A federal court cracks down on seal hunters as the United States asserts its authority over Alaskan waters.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
In the case of the schooner Alpha, evidence showed the captain was in those waters for the purpose of maintaining a cannery on the Yukon, but nothing was found suitable for such a purpose. The vessel was declared forfeited. The court's judgment is that the seal industry is one of the most valuable on the coast, and the laws governing it were passed for their protection. Judge Dawson declared that the entry in the logbook of the schooner Lilly L. was made at a different time for a purpose, and was strong evidence of guilt on the part of the officers. The judgment of the court was that the vessel be forfeited to the United States. In the case of the American schooner Arago, Captain Brewer claimed the right to take seals in the Bering Sea, outside the three-mile limit. The vessel was also declared forfeited. Evidence in the case of the Kate and Anna showed that among the 577 skins on board, 110 had been recently killed. Judge Dawson noted that given the weather, it was doubtful if the schooner could have come from the distance stated. Judgment of forfeiture was entered in that case as well.
“The seal industry is one of the most valuable on the coast, and the laws governing it were passed for their protection.”
This 1887 legal battle over the Bering Sea reflects the long history of tension between commercial extraction, territorial sovereignty, and the preservation of natural resources—a struggle that remains central to Pacific Northwest environmental politics today.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.