The Wealth of the Nation Trapped in the Vaults
A century and a half ago, President Grover Cleveland grappled with a modern-sounding crisis: federal budget surpluses causing economic panic, skyrocketing costs for common goods, and the crushing weight of a tariff system on working families.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
The surplus in the treasury for the present year amounts on the last day of December to $55,567,119, and it is estimated to reach the sum of $140,000,000 by the 30th of June next. With such a withdrawal from the people's circulating medium, our business community may in the near future be subjected to the same distress which was quite lately produced from the same causes. While the functions of our national treasury should be kept separate from private business interests, yet when by a perversion of its purposes it idly holds money willfully withdrawn from the channels of trade, there seems to be reason for the claim that legitimate means should be devised by the government to restore it to the people. The farmer and agriculturalist, who pay the price which the tariff imposes upon all agricultural implements, are told that a high duty on imported wool is necessary for the benefit of those who have sheep to shear. They are not reminded that the farmer who has sheep is by this scheme obliged in his purchase of clothing and woolen goods to pay a tribute to his fellow farmer as well as to the manufacturer and merchant. When the farmer finds it necessary to purchase woolen goods and materials to clothe his family, he is forced to pay a tribute which is not only paid to the manufacturer, but a further amount has been added to the benefit of the sheep owners. Our present tariff laws are the various inequitable and illogical modes of unnecessary taxation.
“The farmer and agriculturalist... are told that a high duty on imported wool is necessary for the benefit of those who have sheep to shear. They are not reminded that the farmer who has sheep is by this scheme obliged... to pay a tribute to his fellow farmer as well as to the manufacturer.”
Cleveland's 1887 critique of 'idle money' and how tax structures benefit concentrated wealth at the expense of working families resonates sharply with today's debates on housing affordability and corporate tax policy in Seattle. Just as then, the disconnect between national fiscal policy and the daily cost of living for residents remains a central point of civic frustration.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.