The Ice King’s Plot: How a Monopoly Would Have Starved Seattle of Cold
A Chicago-based trust is buying up ice companies across the nation to control prices. In Washington, experts warn that consolidating dozens of competing delivery wagons into a single fleet will leave thousands of local workers unemployed.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
SEATTLE, April 19 — The promoters and others interested in the colossal ice combine say that its object is not to advance prices generally, but to make them uniform in all the cities controlled by the International Ice Combination.
The scheme of the combine is to effect a big saving in delivering ice to the consumers. Instead of a dozen or more companies competing for the business, the cities will be divided into districts, and one delivery wagon will supply a district.
In this city, where there are upward of 100 delivery wagons used during the warm season by the various companies, they say they can do the work with 25 wagons, which means that from 75 to 80 men will find employment in Toledo alone in delivering ice than heretofore.
Take all the cities on the same basis and it can be readily seen that several thousand ice handlers will be unable to find work.
This 1904 report on an attempted monopoly of a basic utility—ice—mirrors modern debates over gig-economy consolidation and corporate control of essential services. Just as the 'trust' promised efficiency at the cost of labor, today's platform monopolies often argue that centralization lowers costs for consumers while displacing independent workers.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.