Same Streets
← All stories

The Trial of the Man Who Named Himself 'Defendant'

A former newspaper man takes the witness stand in Seattle to explain his eccentric public preachings, his 'divine' inspirations, and his rejection of the name Jones.

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

The whole afternoon was occupied in Judge Lichtenberg's court trying the case of Charles Frank Jones, a former newspaper man charged with insanity. When called to the stand, Jones refused to swear the oath, stating he would affirm, as he would not 'swear' to anything. When the judge asked his name, age, and place of birth, Jones replied, 'I do not know.' He explained his existence as a series of transfers between orphanages and schools in London, Australia, and Canada, eventually arriving in Washington. When asked about his religious beliefs, he claimed to follow Jesus Christ by 'standing up for the rights of man,' often holding an open Bible with an American flag unfurled above it, and wearing a hat with the word 'Liberty'—which he later changed to 'Hope' while in the city lockup. He described himself as a 'confessor of Christ' and claimed that God was in him, asserting that 'when a certain man named Jones received Jesus Christ, the Jones went out.' Despite his claims of being a 'new creature,' medical testimony from Dr. I. M. Young and Dr. M. Hilton suggested he was a monomaniac of unsound mind. Jones maintained throughout that he was simply testing the world's professions of liberty by practicing it himself, stating, 'I couldn't see how liberty could be locked up.'

“I couldn't see how liberty could be locked up. I was testing the professions of liberty by practicing liberty.”

— Printed in The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1892
Then · 1892134 years apartNow · 2026

Jones’s struggle with mental health, religious fervor, and the clash between his unconventional personal philosophy and the rigid expectations of late 19th-century Seattle society mirrors modern debates about how we treat those whose public behavior falls outside accepted social norms. His poignant, if erratic, plea for 'liberty' in the face of state-mandated institutionalization echoes ongoing modern conversations regarding civil liberties and the criminalization of mental health.

The original page

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1892-01-24. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, JAN 24, 1892, Page 5
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.60323, -122.33028 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗