The Price of Virtue in a Growing Boomtown
Mayor George W. Hall rejects 'vicious' municipal profits from sin, grappling with the fiscal reality of a rapidly expanding, fire-scarred Seattle in 1892.
In his 1892 annual message, Mayor George W. Hall addressed the city's transition from a village to a metropolis. A key point of contention was the city's dwindling revenue from licenses and fines. Hall admitted that the projected budget of $150,000 had fallen short by $40,000, attributing the deficit to a deliberate shift in policy. He stated, 'I do not consider that the city government should derive a direct revenue from vice. There is a broad moral difference between reluctantly tolerating a minor offense which cannot altogether be obviated and being a participator in the profits of immorality and crime.' He noted that the 'horde of vicious characters' that had flocked to Seattle during the post-fire construction boom of 1889-1890 were leaving, further reducing the city's intake from fines. Mayor Hall argued that while the loss of this revenue left the city's accounts in disarray, it was a change that no 'reputable citizen will regret.' He urged the City Council to focus on long-term infrastructure, including the purchase of the University grounds for a future city hall, despite the short-term strain on the public coffers.
“I do not consider that the city government should derive a direct revenue from vice. There is a broad moral difference between reluctantly tolerating a minor offense which cannot altogether be obviated and being a participator in the profits of immorality and crime.”
Mayor Hall's struggle to balance a city budget without relying on the criminalization of poverty and 'vice' echoes today's debates regarding Seattle's reliance on regressive taxes and the ongoing ethical questions of using the justice system as a municipal revenue stream.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.