Same Streets
← All stories

The Seattle Mayoralty Race: A Chronic Candidate Returns

John Collins, a repeat contender for mayor, has entered the race once again, challenging J.T. Ronald and shaking up a city election cycle defined by factional infighting and shifting party alliances.

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

It has generally been supposed that the Democrats of the city are practically united for J. T. Ronald for mayor, but such is not the case. Early in the campaign half a dozen candidates were talked of, but the leaders decided that D. H. Gilman should have the nomination if he chose to accept it, and if he declined, J. T. Ronald, though a bad second, would perhaps be as available as any one else. However, when Mr. Gilman refused to stand, everybody said that Mr. Ronald was the next in line. A few days ago, rumors began to circulate that Ronald would not have everything his own way, and yesterday John Collins squarely declared that were he nominated, he would run for mayor. In short, John Collins is now fairly in the fight. This action, though it will surprise outsiders, is clearly understood by those who have watched the course of events here for several years. In the first place, Collins is a chronic candidate for mayor, and his friends feel that no city election is complete unless he is running for the office. He has sustained defeat twice within two years, but he cannot break himself of the habit of trying for the office. Another point to be mentioned is that Collins and Ronald have been antagonistic for a long time. Collins makes no concealment of his contempt for Ronald's political idiosyncrasies and executive ability. If Collins tosses Ronald overboard again, as he did in the fall of 1890, there can be no hope of harmony.

“Collins is a chronic candidate for mayor, and his friends feel that no city election is complete unless he is running for the office.”

— Printed in The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1892
Then · 1892134 years apartNow · 2026

This 1892 report highlights the perpetual motion of Seattle's political scene, where recurring candidates and factional loyalty tests—much like today's intense primary cycles and independent bids—continually frustrate party unity. Even then, the 'chronic' candidate was a recognizable figure in the city's civic ecosystem.

The original page

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1892-02-17. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, FEB 17, 1892, Page 8
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.60323, -122.33028 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗