The Right to Retire Abroad: A Veteran's Pension Fight
When a U.S. Congressman proposed cutting off pensions for veterans living overseas, the Post-Intelligencer defended an English immigrant who served in a New England regiment and returned home to Bradford after the war.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
Representative Newberry of Illinois proposes to cut off all pensions now drawn by foreigners or American citizens residing abroad. This would be a great outrage. The conditions under which a pension is granted do not include any pledge or obligation that the recipient shall continue to reside in the United States. The pension is granted for military service performed, and surely a foreign-born veteran ought to be permitted to live where his pension would be worth most to him. A condition of this kind would have lost both Lafayette and Kosciusko the enjoyment of any pension or land grant voted them by Congress, unless they became residents of America.
There is an Englishman living today in Bradford, England, who enlisted as a private soldier in a New England regiment in 1862, and by gallantry and capacity rose to be its major. This Englishman was wounded at Cedar Creek and draws a pension from our government. His wife is so strongly attached to England that she persuaded her husband after the war to return thither. Is there any reason why this Englishman, who did his duty gallantly, should lose his pension in his declining years because he lives in England?
“The pension is granted for military service performed, and surely a foreign-born veteran ought to be permitted to live where his pension would be worth most to him.”
This 1892 editorial grapples with the globalized movement of people and the portability of public benefits—a precursor to modern debates over residency requirements for social security or military benefits. It reminds us that even in the 19th century, the 'American' identity was complex, involving international labor and service, just as our modern economy relies on a transnational workforce.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.