Same Streets
← All stories

The Fight for Frances: A Seattle Girl’s Battle for Freedom

A sister challenges the detention of a 16-year-old girl in a reformatory without legal warrant, revealing the precarious power institutions held over young women in the 1890s.

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

The Mother Superior of the House of the Good Shepherd has been made defendant in a habeas corpus proceeding instituted by Celia Brochi on behalf of her sister, Frances Brochi, a 16-year-old girl. A petition filed yesterday in the superior court alleges that the girl is unlawfully restrained of her liberty at the institution, which is represented to be a reform school for girls but has no authority of law as such. The restraint is claimed to be illegal because there were no proceedings against the girl by which any one was given authority to deprive her of her liberty. It is charged that Frances is kept a prisoner and compelled to perform labor of a menial nature; that she is not being taught anything in the way of education and is not allowed to communicate with her friends.

The pretense upon which she is kept at the House of the Good Shepherd is alleged to be that she was left there by her mother. The petition sets out, however, that the mother, who lives in Skagit County, told her daughter to leave home. The girl then came to Seattle, and the mother caused her arrest here. She was confined in the city jail for twenty-four hours without any charge being placed against her. She was then taken to the House of the Good Shepherd, while the mother abandoned her and went home to Skagit County. Judge Lichtenberg issued a writ returnable on March 5, when the case will come up for trial.

“It is charged that Frances is kept a prisoner and compelled to perform labor of a menial nature; that she is not being taught anything in the way of education, and is not allowed to correspond or communicate with her friends.”

— Printed in The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1892
Then · 1892134 years apartNow · 2026

This case highlights the historical lack of due process for young women deemed 'unruly' by families or social authorities—an early 20th-century iteration of the struggle for bodily autonomy and protection against coercive, non-governmental institutionalization that remains a sensitive issue in modern child welfare and mental health discourse.

The original page

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1892-02-25. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, FEB 25, 1892, Page 5
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.60323, -122.33028 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗