The 'Two Percent' Mayoralty: How Tacoma's Populist Boss Won the Ticket
When Alexander Parker, a wealthy lender known for 'only' charging two percent interest, vied for the mayor's office, he didn't just run a campaign—he staged a spectacle of political maneuvering and local theater at Germania Hall.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
Prominent Democrats gathered in Tacoma on March 26, 1892, to finalize a ticket for the upcoming municipal election. The convention, held at Germania Hall, was marked by tension between the 'young Turks'—who ardently supported Tom Carroll—and the party elders, who were determined to install Alexander Parker as their mayoral candidate. Parker, a wealthy figure who had arrived in Tacoma in 1888, was famously dubbed 'Two Percent' for his reputation as a lender who undercut the 'greedy sharks' charging four percent interest. Despite the enthusiasm for Carroll, the convention floor was tightly controlled by party bosses. In a carefully orchestrated display, Parker appeared before the delegates to solidify his support. Even when opposition arose from delegates like W.H. Reed, the machine pushed the nomination through. Parker himself leaned into the theatrics, declaring, 'You have touched the button, the people will do the rest!'—a line that brought the house down. By the end of the session, the ticket was set, and the Democrats were hopeful that Parker’s personal fortune and popularity would propel them to victory against the Republicans.
“You have touched the button, the people will do the rest!”
The 1892 Tacoma election, driven by concerns over city corruption funds and a 'Colossus' of corporate interests, feels eerily contemporary. Today’s Seattle voters grapple with similar anxieties regarding dark money, the influence of wealthy donors on mayoral platforms, and the eternal debate over whether a candidate can truly be a 'philanthropist' while holding the purse strings of the working class.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.