The Man Who Wanted Only the Rich to Vote
At the University of Washington’s first commencement, a visiting judge delivered a fiery address arguing that municipal government is like a railroad company: those without property should have no say in its management.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
The Commencement exercises of the University of Washington were held in the Presbyterian Church yesterday afternoon. Long before the hour announced for the exercises to commence, the large edifice was crowded to its utmost capacity.
After prayers and student orations on topics like 'The Scholar's Hope' and 'Worry,' the day’s proceedings took a sharp political turn with the introduction of Hon. M. P. Dendy, United States District Judge for Oregon, who had kindly consented to deliver the annual address. The subject chosen by the judge was 'Towns and Cities.'
The address was exhaustive and complete; the speaker took strong grounds in favor of property qualifications in all municipal affairs. He showed by actual figures how alarmingly some of the large cities are running behind financially on account of mismanagement and dishonesty in municipal affairs. He took the position that a town or city government was a corporation just as much as a steamboat or railroad company, and those who own no property, or represent no stock in the municipal corporation, have no more right to vote for its officers or directors than outsiders who hold no stock in a railroad or steamboat company have a right to a voice in its management, or a vote in its meetings. At the close of his able address, the judge was loudly applauded.
In 1882, Seattle’s legal elite argued that democracy should be limited to property owners, framing voting as a financial transaction rather than a civic right. This 'corporation theory' of government echoes modern debates over voter suppression and the influence of wealth in local politics, reminding us that the fight for universal suffrage is an ongoing struggle against concentrated power.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.