Same Streets
← All stories

The Petty Feud Over the Lake Washington Canal

While Seattle lawmakers pushed for a monumental canal to connect the lakes to the Puget Sound, Tacoma’s boosters fought the project simply to spite their rival neighbor.

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

A fight is being waged upon the Lake Washington canal, in which Tacoma and chambers of commerce in towns in which Tacoma's influence has some weight are taking an active part. They are endeavoring to prevent any appropriation being made or the passage of Senator Squire's bill, which has already been practically agreed on in the Senate commerce committee. It is understood that these cities are petitioning against any appropriation being made, and insist that such a canal will cost a great deal more than the benefit to be derived therefrom. In retaliation it is understood that certain people are making an effort to prevent any action being taken upon the Puyallup Indian reservation bill, and these internal quarrels in the state are being noised about and will probably result in a defeat of legislation of importance to both cities and to the state at large. In urging upon Congress the importance of the Lakes Union and Washington canal, Senator Squire has no other object than to do what is best for his state and for the nation as a whole. He and other public men recognize the importance of having a fresh water harbor which will be within reach of the large naval vessels of the Pacific coast. Not only that, but it will open up large commercial interests and manufacturing establishments on these lakes, which will be connected with Puget Sound, and for this reason he thinks that the whole state will be benefited and no section injured by the construction of the canal. He, as well as other statesmen, are much surprised that any opposition should be developed in that state against so important a project.

“Senator Squire has no other object than to do what is best for his state and for the nation as a whole... he is much surprised that any opposition should be developed in that state against so important a project.”

— Printed in The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1892
Then · 1892134 years apartNow · 2026

The century-old rivalry between Seattle and Tacoma over infrastructure funding and regional dominance remains a staple of Puget Sound politics. Just as the canal faced petty obstructionism in 1892, modern regional transit and housing projects often fall prey to the same zero-sum parochialism.

The original page

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1892-05-04. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, MAY 4, 1892, Page 1
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.60323, -122.33028 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗