Same Streets
← All stories

The Mayor's Battle Against the Saloon

Mayor J. T. Ronald vetoes a retail liquor license, charging the council with 'gerrymandering' and favoring special interests over the well-being of residential neighborhoods and schools.

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

I herewith return without my approval house of delegates bill No. 240, entitled 'An ordinance granting a retail license for the sale of intoxicating liquor to E. H. Plummer and C. A. Phelps.' The place mentioned within this ordinance wherein it is proposed to sell liquor is without the license limits and therefore disapproved. I have devoted much time and investigation to this matter, having more time for information concerning this ordinance than the council. It is my duty to look to the right thing in the interest of all and not for the benefit of any individual. The peculiar sinuosity of this ordinance in this locality partakes at one and the same time alike of the nature of gerrymandering, class legislation and special legislation. It is within a few feet of the Armory, the great public resort of all our people for amusement. It is but one block from the university and on the direct route of travel of most of the students to that institution, both male and female; and for this reason is likewise opposed by the faculty. I am informed by the grantor of these premises that the grantee, the present owner, gave his word of honor that he would never ask or allow that liquors be sold on the property so long as the residents objected. My disapproval is solely because I believe this extension unwise and unjust to a large part of our people.

“The peculiar sinuosity of this ordinance in this locality partakes at one and the same time alike of the nature of gerrymandering, class legislation and special legislation.”

— Printed in The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1892
Then · 1892134 years apartNow · 2026

Mayor Ronald's 1892 veto highlights a familiar Seattle struggle: the tension between zoning for vice or profit and the preservation of residential quality of life. Even today, the debate over where alcohol can be sold and its impact on neighborhoods remains a central theme in city council debates.

The original page

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1892-09-15. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, SEP 15, 1892, Page 7
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.60717, -122.33610 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗