Same Streets
← All stories

The Mock Wedding Scandal

A Seattle bride files for divorce, revealing her husband tricked her into a sham ceremony before marrying her for real under the watch of a constable.

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

A divorce suit filed yesterday by Mary Mudgett against Alfred W. Mudgett, on the grounds of desertion and failure to support, is the sequel to a breezy scandal that was made public last June. Mudgett was formerly employed as a conductor on the North Seattle electric line. He had for some time been paying his attention to Miss Mary Groves, who lived with her mother in Queen Anne town. On May 10 he induced the girl to consent to a clandestine marriage with him at Victoria. Not long afterward, Miss Groves, or Mrs. Mudgett, discovered that Mudgett was very attentive to Mrs. Emma Debbie, a widow with whom he boarded on West street. It then came out that the girl had been deceived by Mudgett with a mock marriage. On June 15 Miss Groves' mother secured a marriage license for her daughter and Mudgett. Justice Von Tobel was summoned. There, in the presence of a constable, Charles Robinson, and a deputy sheriff, Mudgett became an unwilling bridegroom. Just before the ceremony, a very exciting scene was caused by an attempt on the part of Miss Groves to shoot Mudgett. The disclosure of Mudgett's transactions called forth the wrath of Mrs. Debbie, and a few days after his marriage he disappeared from the city. In her complaint Mrs. Mudgett alleges that she has never been known by her husband's name and has never passed as his wife. She asks the court to restore her to her maiden name of Mary Groves.

“Just before the ceremony, a very exciting scene was caused by an attempt on the part of Miss Groves to shoot Mudgett.”

— Printed in The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1892
Then · 1892134 years apartNow · 2026

This bizarre case of 'marriage fraud' reflects the intense social policing of domesticity in 1890s Seattle. While modern marriage laws have evolved, the scandal points to a time when a woman's public identity—and her legal standing—could be completely unraveled by a man's deception.

The original page

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1892-11-23. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, NOV 23, 1892, Page 5
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.57138, -122.35374 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗