Disaster on the Seattle Waterfront
A wharf collapses under the weight of cargo, sparking a bitter dispute over liability and salvage rights.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
The losses resulting from the collapse of H. W. Baker & Co.'s wharf Wednesday night are much heavier than first supposed, with the total loss estimated at $35,000. Spencer & Co. lost 3,000 sacks of sugar, while the Myers Packing Company saw half of their two carloads of canned salmon sink into the bay. Webb & Co. lost 220 chests of tea that had just arrived from Vancouver. All day, men worked to recover merchandise, and wreckers have already filed salvage claims against the goods. Two men, V. Pregiaul and John Francisco, were arrested for stealing goods from the wreck, allegedly pilfering a box of soap. A heated debate has emerged among waterfront observers regarding liability: merchants hope to hold someone responsible, while some suggest the wharf owner, Capt. David Gilmore, built a structure insufficient for the depth of water and the load it carried. Gilmore maintains the wharf was built as well as possible for its design.
“The question of liability is a much mooted one just at the present time and a thousand different theories are advanced by the numerous amateur admiralty lawyers on the water front.”
The precarious nature of 19th-century waterfront infrastructure—built quickly on piling over deep water—frequently led to catastrophic failures. Today's Seattle waterfront has been transformed by massive concrete seawalls and seismic engineering, yet the tension between private property owners and the public interest in navigating the harbor remains a civic constant.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.