The People’s Franchise: Seattle Rises Against the Streetcar Monopoly
In June 1899, hundreds of citizens packed Armory Hall to declare 'No More Franchises,' demanding that the city council stop selling off public rights-of-way to private railway companies without voter approval.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
ANTI-FRANCHISE MEETING TONIGHT
This continues the anti-franchise movement that has been gathering momentum. A large meeting will be held in Armory Hall tonight.
The committee of one hundred has had the matter in every way possible, and indications are for a large attendance.
The object of the meeting tonight will be to discuss municipal ownership and to start the campaign. Mayor W. D. Wood will chairman of the meeting, and as many members of the committee as can secure places on the platform, will act as presidents.
Clara Turner will give vocal solo.
The speakers of the evening are: Rev. Wilson, W. V. Good, H. W. Hill, Judge F. A. Landis, A. P. Harris, L. B. Kerr, Everett Smith, and Clark Hopkins.
The rallying cry of the meeting will be 'No More Franchises!' first, and then 'Municipal Ownership' afterward.
About 100 copies of the following petition are being circulated, many signatures have been obtained:
To the Honorable City Council of the City of Seattle:
The undersigned voters of Seattle hereby petition your honorable body as follows:
1. That you refuse to grant any street railway franchise until the people have a chance to vote upon the subject; 2. That at the earliest possible time you submit to the electors of the city the question of municipal ownership and operation of street railway lines.
A petition is also being provided against the city council to grant a 30-year franchise to the consolidated railway company.
This 1899 protest mirrors modern Seattle’s intense debates over public transit funding, fare structures, and the role of private contractors in our public infrastructure. The demand for 'municipal ownership' echoes today's calls for publicly owned utilities and housing, highlighting a century-long struggle by citizens to keep essential services out of the hands of concentrated private power.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.