The Bitter Grocery Store Feud
A partner’s dramatic claim of intimidation and forced stock surrender rocks the Haley Grocery Company.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
A case of a sensational nature was filed in the superior court yesterday by John Haley against Joseph B. Hill, with whom he has been associated in the business of the Haley Grocery Company, for an accounting. The most startling feature is the charge of fraud and intimidation preferred by the plaintiff, who claims that the defendant has euchred him out of his stock in the company without anything like a sufficient consideration. The complaint filed in the case sets out that the Haley Grocery Company is a corporation with a capital stock of $25,000. Haley charges that on October 28, Hill, by force, threats and violence and by making false and malicious charges and accusations, forced him to sign certain papers, which he believes were assignments of stock to J. B. Hill. The charges that Hill is alleged to have made were that Haley was a common thief and had stolen goods, money and property from the Haley Grocery Company. In fear of criminal prosecution, Haley acceded to Hill's demands. The court is asked to set aside the pretended transfer to Hill and to appoint a receiver.
“The most startling feature is the charge of fraud and intimidation preferred by the plaintiff, who claims that the defendant has euchred him out of his stock.”
This case highlights the era's reliance on 'coercion' tactics in business partnerships before modern corporate governance and HR protections existed. It reflects a time when a personal feud could immediately escalate into a public, courtroom-led crisis for a major local business.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.