The Senator Who Betrayed the County
A political firestorm erupted in Seattle after Senator W.O. Rutter broke his pledge to vote for John B. Allen, sparking widespread public indignation and calls for his political exile.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
The blush of shame mantled the countenance and intense indignation filled the heart of every citizen of Seattle yesterday when they heard the news from Olympia that treachery had invaded the King County legislative phalanx. One man, Senator W.O. Rutter of the Twenty-ninth district, had been found recreant to personal honor, plighted word, and plain duty. Great crowds flocked to the bulletin boards to learn the progress of the senatorial contest, and when the news was posted that Rutter had deserted Allen and voted for Turner, a groan of indignation arose from every throat. Every man felt a personal sense of injury in the transaction, not just that their faith had been betrayed, but that the famous phalanx, which had hitherto brought glory to King County, had at last been pierced. Business men could talk of little else, and it was suggested that corruption was at work and money had been used to effect a breach. Citizens of Rutter’s district, which includes Ballard and Fremont, were particularly indignant, with many calling for a mass meeting to repudiate him. Local leaders and even Justices of the Peace expressed total condemnation, with some suggesting he was mentally unfit for office, while others openly speculated that he had been bought off.
“Has sold his birthright for a mess of pottage. The most charitable construction that I can place upon so base an action is that the man is insane.”
This 1893 political scandal highlights a time when voters felt an intense, direct ownership of their representatives' votes, viewing a broken promise as a fundamental moral failing rather than routine politics. Today, similar ire is often directed at legislative gridlock or perceived betrayal of district interests, showing that the intense local scrutiny of 'who is fighting for us in the capital' remains a constant in Seattle civic culture.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.