The Battle for Elliott Bay’s Tide Lands
A multi-year legal saga over land rights concludes as the government rejects a claim on Seattle's waterfront.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
The office of the register and receiver of the Seattle land office announced yesterday their decision regarding the protest of H. H. Dearborn and the attempt of Louis Langie to locate Sioux half-breed scrip upon the tide lands of Elliott Bay. In October 1889, Langie applied to the office to locate three certificates of Sioux half-breed scrip upon unsurveyed tide land in township 24 north, range 4 east. He filed an affidavit stating he had built a house on the land for his personal use. Dearborn, the Seattle Improvement Company, and John Farnham protested, arguing the tract was public land and partly within city limits. After years of legal back-and-forth and changing rulings on whether tide lands were part of the public domain, the local office officially rejected Langie’s application, stating that the fact the land is tide land would defeat the application regardless of other proofs.
“The fact that the lands are tide lands, in itself, would defeat the application of Langie without other or further proof.”
This case highlights the messy, litigious reality of Seattle's early growth. The struggle to define property rights on the tide lands was a precursor to the massive regrade and industrial projects that eventually redefined the city’s waterfront.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.