Same Streets
← All stories

City Hall's Incompetent Board of Works

A critical letter exposes the lack of qualifications among the men overseeing Seattle's infrastructure, from water pipes to sewer systems.

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

To the Editor: Superintendent Walter W. Wilson resigned to the ignominy which our board of works has seen fit to heap on him by his summary dismissal. There has never been a single question raised as to the fitness for the position of any of the appointees for some of the most important positions in the city service. The only apparent reason for membership on the board is the 'pull' they possessed with the executive. The city owns its water plant, constructs its sewers, maintains fire apparatus, and oversees wharves, yet our mayor asserts that a knowledge of construction or mechanical engineering is not required of the board members. Let us look at the current members: First, Jesse Cochran—a good painter and sign writer, but he would disclaim all knowledge of engineering. Second, J. W. Van Brocklin—a former mine laborer who 'made a strike' in Montana, but whose construction projects—like the Transfer Company building—have been prone to failure and collapse. Third, J. W. Wolf—an alderman who admitted he knew nothing about brickwork or tunnels when he was appointed. These men are entrusted with our city's expensive machinery, and when questioned about their selection of fire equipment, they immortalized themselves by stating they merely 'listened to the stories of the agents.' If the city wants efficient service, it must employ efficient men to direct that service, and fire the current board of works bodily.

“The fact is the present council have a new interpretation of the saying that 'a public office is a public trust.' Oh, no. Not now, at least with our present city administration. Their version is 'a public office is a private snap.'”

— Printed in The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1893
Then · 1893133 years apartNow · 2026

This 1891 critique of Seattle's 'spoils system' and unqualified political appointees echoes persistent debates about the city's oversight of major infrastructure projects and public utilities. The author's demand for specialized professional oversight over political patronage is a recurring theme in Seattle's civic governance history.

The original page

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1893-04-21. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, APR 21, 1893, Page 2
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.60323, -122.33028 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗