The Battle for the Mud Flats
City Engineer R.H. Thomson warns that the Seattle & Montana Railway’s proposed terminal layout would block the city's future industrial access and sabotage the drainage of the tide flats.
City Engineer R.H. Thomson filed a report with the board of public works regarding the proposed franchise for the extension of the Great Northern tracks from Railroad Avenue to the depot grounds on Jackson Street. Thomson warns that the construction of tracks as requested by the Seattle & Montana Railway would force steep, impractical grade changes on Jackson, Commercial, Second, Third, and Fourth streets. Such grades would effectively bar heavy traffic between the city and the 'mud flat' district. Furthermore, the plan threatens to place the terminal district at an elevation too low for gravity sewerage, forcing the city into expensive pumping operations. Thomson insists that the city must prioritize a unified terminal plan to ensure that the tide flats remain a viable manufacturing and commercial district rather than allowing individual railways to dictate street grades and block public access.
“In this age the deliberate construction of a grade crossing with any railway is regarded as almost criminal.”
This 1893 conflict over the Seattle tide flats mirrors modern struggles where industrial, transit, and development interests clash over land use. Thomson’s insistence on a 'unified plan' reflects the perennial tension in Seattle between city-led master planning and the private rail and port infrastructure that built the city’s economy.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.