The Saloon-Bonding Controversy in Mount Vernon
A local moral panic over a proposed saloon location threatens to derail a crucial municipal bond election.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
The voters of Mount Vernon will tomorrow decide whether to ratify about $8,000 of so-called illegal warrants and whether they will issue bonds in the sum of about $15,000 to take up all the floating indebtedness of the city. The propositions were fully discussed by the council and citizens five or six weeks ago, and the sentiment was unanimous for ratification and bonding. About two weeks ago, however, the council incurred the displeasure of an element in the city by refusing to grant a saloon license for a saloon a few doors from two churches and in a residence district. This element aroused itself and declared that it would beat the bonds if the council did not reconsider its action. Accordingly, Friday night the council passed a resolution in that direction. That made more citizens mad, including the residents near the proposed saloon, and they are on the warpath now. Altogether the situation is a decidedly unique one, but it is thought that the good sense of voters will come to the rescue on election day.
“This element aroused itself and declared that it would beat the bonds if the council did not reconsider its action.”
Local land-use battles, particularly those involving alcohol permits and neighborhood character, have remained a constant friction point in Washington civic life for over 130 years. The intersection of municipal finance and moral posturing continues to define the landscape of small-town Washington politics.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.