Same Streets
← All stories

The Forgery Charge Against Mrs. Yesler Collapses

A technicality involving a legislative change to the law lets Mrs. Minnie G. Yesler and her co-defendants off the hook for alleged forgery.

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

Judge Furnas yesterday sustained the motion of Mrs. Minnie G. Yesler asking that the charge of forgery preferred against her be dismissed. The case had been taken under advisement on June 29, on which date it was finally submitted. Mrs. Yesler's attorneys argued that the last legislature, in a law providing for the punishment of the crime of illegally destroying records, had repealed the act under which the information against Mrs. Yesler was filed, on the ground that the old act had no further validity. This was the ground on which they based their motion. The prosecution argued that since the information filed against Mrs. Yesler alleged the destruction of her husband's papers while he was still living, and not dead, the new law would not apply. Judge Furnas intimated that he would sustain the motion, but he withheld judgment to allow for the filing of formal exceptions. Attorney John F. Miller gave notice of an appeal from Judge Furnas's ruling yesterday. Under the law, the state has the same right of appeal as the defendant. In case the supreme court affirms the ruling of the lower court, the prosecution will fall back upon the claim of conspiracy made against Mrs. Yesler and fight to a finish on that line. By today's decision, the charges of forgery made against Dr. J. Eugene Ferris and Dr. H. Martin Van Buren, who were co-defendants with Mrs. Yesler on both charges, also fall to the ground.

“Judge Furnas yesterday sustained the motion of Mrs. Minnie G. Yesler asking that the charge of forgery preferred against her be dismissed.”

— Printed in The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1893
Then · 1893133 years apartNow · 2026

Legal wrangling over legislative updates and the dismissal of high-profile cases for technical reasons remains a constant in the Seattle judicial system. These Victorian-era legal battles often mirrored the city's broader power dynamics between the social elite and the prosecuting authorities.

The original page

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1893-07-02. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, JUL 2, 1893, Page 5
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.60323, -122.33028 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗