The City Hall Salary Wars
Seattle's House of Delegates and the Board of Aldermen clash over deep budget cuts to city staff and police.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
The house of delegates wrestled last night with the salary reduction proposition for three hours, attempting to bridge the gap between their own rates and those framed by the aldermen. The house declared its belief that the aldermanic scale was too radical. In the afternoon, a meeting of the advisory board—including the mayor, comptroller, and department heads—convened to prepare an amended proposition. The principal amendments included reducing the clerical force in the comptroller’s office and the treasurer’s office, while consolidating the market inspector and sanitary inspector roles. During the session, Superintendent Helma protested the proposed salary cuts for building inspectors, arguing that Seattle’s workload far exceeded that of Tacoma. The debate extended to the police department, where Chief Juleen expressed concern that further reductions would impair the efficiency of his force, yet ultimately, the house reached a compromise on a new salary schedule for city employees, including police, firemen, and clerks.
“For his part, his hours of duty were from 8 a. m. to about 12 p. m. He thought the force might be reduced by six men until winter.”
Budget-balancing through salary cuts at City Hall is a perennial Seattle tradition. The 1893 debates over whether to pay city inspectors $4 or $5 a day echo today's ongoing civic arguments regarding municipal staffing levels and the cost of maintaining city infrastructure.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.