The Watermelon War at Snoqualmie
A young man's struggle against an aggressive hop ranch owner lands in federal court, ending in a victory for property rights.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
The celebrated Snoqualmie hop garden case of Ralph S. Hopkins, of Seattle, vs. H. E. Levy of Victoria, which has been in the United States courts nearly three years, came to an end yesterday by Mr. Levy paying Mr. Hopkins a sum greatly in excess of the original judgment. The case is a landmark as to the facts as well as to the law points involved. Ralph Hopkins, son of ex-United States Marshal Charles Hopkins, was engaged in the watermelon business in the summer and fall of 1890. He shipped carloads of melons into Seattle, and finally, when the market became flat, he took a carload to Snoqualmie to sell to the hop pickers. When he arrived at the hop ranch and began disposing of his melons on the county road, he was ordered to leave by H. E. Levy, a stockholder of the Snoqualmie Hop Growers Association. He refused to go and was placed under restraint of a guard. Hopkins later returned with another load, which enraged Levy, who again arrested him without legal process and locked him up for three hours. Hopkins sued Levy for $5,000 in damages for the unlawful detention and won a $1,000 verdict. Levy resisted execution of the judgment by claiming his property was community property, but Judge Hanford ruled that rents and issues of community property were liable for personal obligations. Levy finally settled the judgment yesterday for $1,577.
“Hopkins, who was only a boy in years, was greatly agitated and disturbed in mind and body.”
This 1890s dispute highlights the long-standing friction between itinerant street vendors and private land interests in Washington. Today, the tension has shifted from hop ranches to modern battles over public space, food trucks, and zoning, yet the core question of who has the right to conduct commerce on public or quasi-public land remains a vital local debate.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.