The Railway Monopoly’s Grip Loosens
A local rail executive challenges a restrictive traffic contract, opening competitive freight rates for the region.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
A practically significant step in the breaking of the traffic contract with the Northern Pacific Railroad was taken by Mr. Brown of the Seattle, Lake Shore & Eastern road. Hitherto, business had been done jointly with the Northern Pacific, but only at the option of Mr. Brown, who had the power to disregard those arrangements and treat the Lake Shore as an independent road. The definite step taken was the cancellation of the former rate and the substitution of the Great Northern classification rate. The Northern Pacific had made the Pacific coast terminal rate apply from shipping points on the Lake Shore when the freight was to be shipped over its own line, but when going to a point on another line, the rate from the local point to Seattle was made double the standard first-class rate. As this was too high, it effectively prohibited shipments by any other line. The new rates are less than half the arbitrary charges formerly exacted, and this rate will be charged on all shipments, whether billed over the Northern Pacific or any other connecting line.
“To all intents and purposes, the traffic contract is a thing of the past, though not formally annulled.”
This 1893 battle against monopolistic freight pricing mirrors today's ongoing debates over infrastructure control and the 'open access' requirements for modern digital marketplaces and transit networks. Seattle has long been a place where the control of the shipping route dictates the prosperity of the local producer.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.