The Trial of a Man Known Only as a 'Pimp'
A Seattle lawyer challenges a city ordinance that allows for arrests based on reputation rather than criminal acts.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
The validity of another city ordinance was attacked yesterday by Attorney Frank K. Sims in Judge Glasgow's court. He was defending John Kelly, who was arrested on the charge of being commonly known as a pimp. The language of the ordinance is peculiar in that the offense consists not alone in being a pimp, but being commonly known as such. Mr. Sims maintained that a man cannot be punished on account of the reputation he bears, which may not be well founded on fact. Judge Glasgow took the case under advisement.
“A man cannot be punished on account of the reputation he bears, which may not be well founded on fact.”
This case highlights the long history of 'status-based' policing in Seattle, where ordinances targeting how a person is perceived or 'known' have historically been used to criminalize marginalized groups. It mirrors ongoing debates about modern anti-loitering or 'civility' laws that critics argue target people based on their housing status or reputation rather than specific, observable crimes.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.