Internal Strife in the Baptist Convention
A fiery protest from the Mount Vernon Baptist Church challenges the claimed vindication of Reverend D. D. Proper.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
The Baptist ministers who preferred charges against Rev. D. D. Proper before the recent convention decline to accept the decision of the committee on the subject as final. Reverend William P. Squires of Mount Vernon wrote: 'Mr. Proper was not vindicated. The committee was trying to let him down easy. One of the committee members told me that the committee was not appointed to investigate, but to see how it could avoid an investigation. The chairman told Reverend Mr. Shearman of Olympia that his testimony was the most damaging, as it had convicted Mr. Proper on the testimony of ten persons of falsehood. I presented evidence from six other persons to the same effect, as well as evidence under the seal of churches. Mr. Proper refused to let this matter go before an arbitration committee, knowing full well that he would have been condemned. We are prepared to substantiate every statement we make.'
“The committee was not appointed to investigate, but to see how it could avoid an investigation; or in his own words, 'how not to do it.'”
Ecclesiastical disputes in the 1890s were public spectacles that frequently made the front pages of the Seattle press. This archival conflict highlights how deeply institutional reputation and moral authority were woven into the civic fabric of turn-of-the-century Washington life.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.