The Tacoma Water Swindle Scandal
Taxpayers demand an investigation into claims that city officials engaged in criminal fraud during the procurement of the municipal water system.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
The taxpayers of Tacoma have finally realized that the Post-Intelligencer told the whole truth regarding the $100,000 water steal, and have asked that a special grand jury be summoned to investigate the frauds perpetrated by derelict city officials. Inside of a few hours, the petition was signed by between sixty and seventy taxpayers. The petition asserts that while citizens entrusted their chosen officers with the adjustment of public questions, it has since developed that great frauds were perpetrated, and that some public officers have been party to these actions. The petitioners state there is grave fear that further frauds are about to be committed and that a thorough examination is necessary to protect public interests. As soon as the manipulators heard of the petition, there was a commotion and every effort was made to squelch it. Opponents claimed that the city is not in a condition to warrant an investigation, while supporters countered that if steals and jobbery are to be put an end to, the investigation must proceed, as a general cleaning up is necessary to save the city's remaining assets.
“If steals and jobbery are to be put an end to, then there must be investigation.”
This 1893 conflict over municipal infrastructure and perceived corruption echoes ongoing debates in Pacific Northwest cities regarding the transparency of public-private utility partnerships and the accountability of city officials for major capital projects.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.