Same Streets
← All stories

The Double-Voting Scandal at the School Board

A Seattle man is convicted for voting twice in a single school election, sparking a tense courtroom drama involving local political heavyweights.

The law which says that no man shall vote twice at any election, and which many voters are ignorant of, specifically including school elections, was vindicated in a startling manner yesterday when a jury in Judge Hones’ court convicted Bob Johnston of voting twice at a school election. So great was the panic among his confederates, Patrick Flynn and Richard Long, who were also indicted with Johnston for violations of the same law at the same election, that they refused to be tried before the same jury. As there was but the one panel, Judge Hones refused to call a new one, and their cases were stricken from the trial calendar to be set for next month when a new jury will be empaneled.

The courtroom was crowded yesterday with a large delegation from the wards and numerous representatives from other wards of the city. Johnston was well supported by attorneys, including W. E. Crews, who was a candidate for school director at the same election. The case for the state was opened by C. A. Spriggs, until within the last few months a police officer, who testified he saw Johnston vote at the polling place at Third and Yesler, and that to his knowledge he also voted at the Front and Marion street polling place. Other witnesses testified to seeing Johnston around the polls. To explain, Johnston took the stand and made a general denial, claiming he spelled his name 'Johnston' and insisted a mistake had been made by some other Johnston. A large number of his friends took the stand to swear he only voted once, but the jury reached a verdict of guilty after a short deliberation.

“The law which says that no man shall vote twice at any election... was vindicated in a startling manner.”

— Printed in The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1893
Then · 1893133 years apartNow · 2026

Election integrity remains a perennial touchstone in American politics, though the stakes have shifted from the ward-level ballot-stuffing of the 1890s to modern debates over registration and access. The high-stakes drama of this case—where political candidates served as defense counsel for those accused of illegal voting—illustrates the raw, localized nature of civic power in early Seattle.

The original page

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1893-12-07. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, DEC 7, 1893, Page 5
Text
Cleaned up from the page — spelling and layout repaired — not a word-for-word transcription. The page itself is above, for exact wording.
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.60323, -122.33028 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗