Same Streets
← All stories

The Brotherhood Challenges a Receiver's Firing Spree

Conductors from the Seattle, Lake Shore & Eastern railroad sue for reinstatement, claiming their firing was a retaliatory, arbitrary act by a receiver ignoring labor contracts.

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

Nine passenger conductors of the Seattle, Lake Shore & Eastern Railroad, who were discharged by Receiver Brown on October 1 and November 14 because he suspected them of 'knocking down' fares, have sued the receiver to compel him to give them an investigation. They argue that a standing contract between the Northern Pacific Railway and the Brotherhood of Railway Trainmen—which had operated the line—remains binding despite the receivership. The petitioners allege that the receiver has arrogated to himself unlimited power in cutting wages and discharging men without consulting the brotherhood or the court. Receiver Brown dismisses the suit as an attempt to identify 'spotters' used by the company. He asserts that he has no contract with the brotherhood and maintains absolute authority to hire and fire as if he were the owner, warning that if the men strike, he will make a 'pretty good scramble to stand up for our rights.'

“I have had no contract with the Northern Pacific... and the Brotherhood of Trainmen has nothing whatever to say about the management of the road.”

— Printed in The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1893
Then · 1893133 years apartNow · 2026

This 1894 labor dispute highlights the early tension between corporate receivership management and organized labor in Seattle. The struggle over 'spotters'—covert fare inspectors—mirrors modern debates over algorithmic management and surveillance in the gig economy, where the 'arbitrary will' of an platform operator often clashes with the rights of workers to a fair hearing.

The original page

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1893-12-12. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, DEC 12, 1893, Page 8
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.60323, -122.33028 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗