The Football Defense: A 19th-Century Debate on Brutality
Readers spar in the pages of the Post-Intelligencer over whether American college football is a ‘scientific’ athletic endeavor or a barbaric ‘prized-fight’ masquerading as sport.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
In your issue of December 26 I read a letter condemning football signed by J. B. Chapman, M. D. The doctor acknowledges he knows nothing about the game, having witnessed just one match. Football is undoubtedly the most scientific game played in athletics. It is fashionable to pitch into football probably because the public thirsts for something sensational. The game is dangerous in a certain degree, but not as much as lacrosse, polo on ponies, or cross-country riding. There are brutal men among football players, but the game itself is not brutal. Slugging, foul tackling, and all other foul playing is strictly prohibited in the rules. Thousands of young men have played football in the United States during the past fall, and in the neighborhood of half a dozen deaths have resulted indirectly from football and only two directly. A former London player also writes: 'It strikes me that the doctor is surely rather severe condemning a popular pastime on the strength of one game. Surely the game can be shorn of a great deal of its brutality by adopting some other rules, such as the Association game, which is the popular pastime of Britain.'
“It seems to me a little too much like lynching a man on very slim circumstantial evidence, and that evidence hearsay.”
This debate echoes modern concerns regarding athlete safety, head trauma, and the commodification of college sports. The 1893 argument for 'scientific' play feels uncannily like modern sports commentary, despite the dramatic shift in how we perceive injury and the 'manly virtues' defined by Roosevelt in the original text.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.