Same Streets
← All stories

City Moves to Shut Down Dance Houses

A municipal judge rules against saloons operating dance halls, marking a turning point in the city's crackdown on 'lewd and lascivious' nightlife.

Judge Glasgow of the municipal court rendered a decision yesterday in the case of the City of Seattle vs. James Monroe, charged with conducting a dance house in which liquors were sold, holding the ordinance under which the arrest was made to be valid. The judge declared that any dance taking place in a saloon or place connected to one where alcohol is sold is a nuisance and may be suppressed by police. Charles Pearson, arrested for conducting a dance hall which was the resort of lewd and lascivious persons, was also found guilty and fined $10. The findings of the jury were a surprise to the dance house proprietors.

“The findings of the jury were a surprise to the dance house proprietors.”

— Printed in The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1894
Then · 1894132 years apartNow · 2026

This 1894 legal skirmish highlights the long-standing tension between municipal authorities and the city’s vice economy. Just as early ordinances used 'nuisance' statutes to target independent entertainment spaces, Seattle’s history of regulating nightlife reflects ongoing civic debates over who owns the city’s moral and public space.

The original page

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1894-01-10. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, JAN 10, 1894, Page 8
Text
Cleaned up from the page — spelling and layout repaired — not a word-for-word transcription. The page itself is above, for exact wording.
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.60414, -122.32906 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗