Same Streets
← All stories

The Seattle Sewer Brick Scandal

A political investigation into allegations that the City of Seattle paid inflated prices for materials used in municipal sewer construction.

Mr. James F. McElroy, a prominent Democrat, stated that the identical brick sold to the city for eight dollars per thousand had previously been offered to one of his clients for five dollars and a quarter per thousand. This is the case as it stands, and it is certainly one which justifies a thorough investigation. If the city is paying more for material than others would be called upon to pay, the people are entitled to know the reason for the difference and to know where the difference goes. The Post-Intelligencer is anxious to have every instance of corruption, from the establishment of the city government to the present hour, brought to light and to have the criminals punished. It believes that the interests of the city have been shamelessly betrayed, not in the sewer contracts alone, but in printing contracts and other contracts as well.

“If the city is paying more for material than others would be called upon to pay, the people are entitled to know the reason for the difference and to know where the difference goes.”

— Printed in The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1894
Then · 1894132 years apartNow · 2026

Municipal contracting scandals—specifically involving the padding of invoices for basic materials—have been a recurring theme in Seattle politics from the city's infancy to the modern era of oversight boards and public transparency requirements.

The original page

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1894-01-26. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, JAN 26, 1894, Page 4
Text
Cleaned up from the page — spelling and layout repaired — not a word-for-word transcription. The page itself is above, for exact wording.
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.60323, -122.33028 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗