The Looming Northern Pacific Strike
Tensions boil over as Northern Pacific railroad employees weigh a general strike against wage cuts and the company's attempt to dissolve organized labor.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
Superintendent Dickinson of the Northern Pacific says: 'I have passed through nine strikes and never before felt as agitated as this. Heretofore we have had to do our own fighting, but in this the United States marshals will have to do it. The strikers will have to strike the United States, and that is why I have all along believed they will not strike.' While railway officials view the strike as a sign of weakness due to the economic depression, workers see a fundamental principle involved: the survival of unionism. The Northern Pacific seeks to deal with employees as individuals, effectively destroying the bargaining power of the organizations. The majority of employees, including telegraphers, trainmen, firemen, engineers, and switchmen, have voted to strike if the company refuses to recognize their unions. To prevent the company from hiring replacement workers, the labor leadership is considering a general strike across all transcontinental roads.
“The Northern Pacific system desires to treat the men individually and as this means the death of organized labor, if successful, the men will lock horns with the company and fight it out.”
This 1894 report captures the intense labor unrest of the era, mirroring today's ongoing debates about gig-economy labor laws, union busting, and the power of collective bargaining in an unforgiving economic climate.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.