The Waterfront Tug-of-War (Feb 14, 1894)
A legal stalemate halts railroad track expansion as property owners fight for their land rights.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
The rail tracks were extended to the northern edge of Columbia street yesterday and there they stop while the lawyers take a turn at the struggle and give the track-layers a rest. Their further progress was stopped by a temporary restraining order issued by Judge Langley late on Monday night forbidding the tearing down of J. M. Colman's building, which stands clear across the right-of-way claimed by the railroad companies. J. M. Colman claims the railroad companies are estopped from building beyond the line described by an agreement, which the railroads marked out with stakes and agreed to allow Colman to erect a building west of that line without interference. While the lawyers were laboring in court, the workmen were getting in some good 'licks' on Columbia street. They completed both tracks to the very edge of the building over which the lawyers are wrangling, not even sparing the sidewalk.
“When they laid their sacrilegious hands on the sidewalk in front of the West Street house, W. F. Butler, the landlord, came out in great agitation and exclaimed: 'Don't you touch that sidewalk.'”
This 1894 battle between private property owners and railroad expansion mirrors Seattle’s long history of civic conflict over waterfront access and development. The struggle to reconcile private commercial interests with public infrastructure remains a central theme in Seattle’s ongoing efforts to balance growth and land use.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.