The Oyster Bed Tug-of-War
Claimants in Shelton fight for their right to oyster beds, ignoring the warnings of 'boodle' newspapers.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
Tacoma, Feb. 25.—The oyster bed claimants in the vicinity of Shelton are to mandamus the state land commissioner, W. F. Forrest, for a certificate of purchase of the oyster beds claimed by them. The matter will be taken before the supreme court this week by ex-Judge Wickersham. This case shows, upon investigation, a laughable incident in connection with the local boodle organ, which imagines the present state administration so wicked that it must do battle every time it imagines something wrong. Recently the paper told about the state land commissioner letting valuable oyster lands go for a song, $12 per acre. The argument for a writ to issue from the supreme court shows that A. J. Smith, J. A. Gels and G. K. Taylor, of Oyster Bay, scraped the tide flats clean, secured oysters, and planted the lands which they now claim. They have complied with all requirements of the law and are entitled to the lands at the price appraised by county officials. The state board of land commissioners, instead of assisting them, has actually declared the beds to be not artificial. The claimants hold that there are 1,000 acres of tide lands adjacent that can be made into oyster beds by the same process, and they demand that the state sell them the lands in accordance with law.
“They claim to have created the oyster beds sought by them, and therefore demand that the same be sold to them in accordance with the laws of the state.”
The struggle over the legal status of tide lands in the 1890s echoes modern-day disputes over land use, public access, and the commodification of Washington's natural resources. Much like today's battles, the definition of 'artificial' versus 'natural' assets continues to have massive financial implications for those holding or claiming the land.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.