Seattle Voters Oust Municipal Corruption
A clean sweep at the polls marks the end of the Ronald and Krug administration, signaling a city-wide demand for reform.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
The people of Seattle wanted a change. They wished to condemn the party that gave them Krug. They were not in sympathy with the political methods that had been used in their municipal affairs. They were determined to run no chances of a repetition of the past two years. The people of Seattle were, in short, in the same mind that the people of Tacoma are in today. The Democrats of Seattle tried to save themselves by nominating Mr. Durie, a man in whom the business public have great confidence, but the people wanted a change—the organization that was responsible for Ronald and Krug could not have their indorsement, and the Democratic ticket was overwhelmingly defeated.
“The people of Seattle wanted a change. They wished to condemn the party that gave them Krug.”
This reflects the recurring cycles of Seattle's 'reform' elections, where frustration with incumbent corruption often leads to dramatic turnovers at City Hall. Much like the 1894 election, modern Seattle voters frequently mobilize to reject political machines perceived as stagnant or ethically compromised.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.