The City Hall Corruption Trial
A jury is empaneled to try an alleged accomplice in a $10,000 city embezzlement scheme.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
The trial of Henry Fuhrman, accused of aiding and abetting an accomplice in the use of $10,000 of city money in 1892, began yesterday after delays in securing an unbiased jury. While Fuhrman's attorney suggested that new facts might arise that distinguish this case from previous ones, the prosecution intends to lean heavily on alleged admissions Fuhrman made before the city council's finance committee. The case follows the recent conviction of his alleged partner, who was sentenced to seven years in prison.
“We will, of course, have to meet the same evidence, I suppose, as in the trial of Krug, but we have new facts and points to raise.”
This trial centers on the public's loss of trust in local governance and the accountability of public officials—a perennial issue in Seattle politics. The frustration with 'missing' city funds echoes modern oversight battles regarding public budget transparency and the misuse of municipal resources.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.