Same Streets
← All stories

The Great Northern Labor Dispute

A railroad executive reflects on the escalating conflict with the American Railway Union and the nuisance of transient workers.

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

President Charles J. Ives, of the Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern road, who was in the city yesterday with a party of friends, is a typical railroad manager. Speaking of the strike on the Great Northern road, he said: 'If it were not for the interest charges which he must meet, I fancy Mr. Hill would be in a good position to starve the strikers out, and, in fact, he would rather make money by letting his road lie idle in these times. The situation is quite complicated, owing to the unknown strength of this new order, the American Railway Union. If it were as widely extended and as organized as the brotherhoods which it apparently seeks to supplant, the contest would be a worse one. But if it is confined mostly to the Great Northern system, and the men do not have the financial support of the brotherhoods, it will be a question of endurance.' Regarding the 'Coxey's Army' movement and the general presence of tramps on the rails, Ives noted: 'As the easiest way of dealing with them we let them ride on our freight trains, but all the towns began to complain that we were dumping a nuisance upon them and we had to put a stop to it.'

“Railroad men are usually a class who have much money laid up for such emergencies.”

— Printed in The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1894
Then · 1894132 years apartNow · 2026

Railroad management during the 1894 Pullman and Great Northern strikes often framed labor unrest as a conflict between 'endurance' and economic stability. Today's debates over labor strikes and the 'nuisance' of unhoused populations in transit hubs mirror these late 19th-century tensions between civic order, corporate profit, and the rights of workers.

The original page

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1894-04-22. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, APR 22, 1894, Page 4
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.60323, -122.33028 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗