The Price of a Marital Settlement
A wife files a scathing counter-complaint alleging coercion, threats, and a secret financial pact in a high-stakes divorce suit.
In the case of J. W. Van Brocklin against his wife, Condara Van Brocklin, the defendant yesterday filed her answer and cross-complaint. She sets forth the date of their marriage, which she says was July 11, 1878, and not January 28, 1875, and gives a general denial to all his allegations. For a counter-claim and cross-complaint, she alleges that in the last year the plaintiff has been guilty of cruel treatment, indignities, etc. Community property is claimed, namely: the residence in Boren's addition, valued at $12,000; a tract in Maynard's addition, valued at $13,000, with improvements valued at $7,000; another tract in that plat, valued at $12,000; also property in Bell's Fourth addition, valued at $15,000. Defendant further claims that he induced her to enter into an agreement with him for the division of the community property whereby he gave her a note for $10,000, secured by mortgage, she waiving and pledging that if she would accept such division he would not attempt to secure a divorce, but that they would continue to live together, and, being moved by tears and threats, she accepted the arrangement. After that, she says, he asked a return of the note and mortgage to give her in lieu a deed of conveyance of the property. Thereafter he secured the return of the deed, and in lieu thereof he gave her a note for $5,000 and allows her $100 a month during her natural life. No children have been born to them, but they have one adopted daughter, Hdea. She asks for a divorce, the custody of the child, and an equitable division of the community property.
“Being moved by tears and threats, she accepted the arrangement.”
This case highlights the long-standing legal struggle of women in Washington to secure their share of community property during divorce. The mention of 'Boren’s Addition' and 'Maynard’s Addition' serves as a reminder that the foundational wealth of Seattle’s modern skyline—now some of the most expensive real estate in the country—was built on land claims tied to these 19th-century domestic legal battles.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.