Same Streets
← All stories

The Price of a Marital Settlement

A wife files a scathing counter-complaint alleging coercion, threats, and a secret financial pact in a high-stakes divorce suit.

In the case of J. W. Van Brocklin against his wife, Condara Van Brocklin, the defendant yesterday filed her answer and cross-complaint. She sets forth the date of their marriage, which she says was July 11, 1878, and not January 28, 1875, and gives a general denial to all his allegations. For a counter-claim and cross-complaint, she alleges that in the last year the plaintiff has been guilty of cruel treatment, indignities, etc. Community property is claimed, namely: the residence in Boren's addition, valued at $12,000; a tract in Maynard's addition, valued at $13,000, with improvements valued at $7,000; another tract in that plat, valued at $12,000; also property in Bell's Fourth addition, valued at $15,000. Defendant further claims that he induced her to enter into an agreement with him for the division of the community property whereby he gave her a note for $10,000, secured by mortgage, she waiving and pledging that if she would accept such division he would not attempt to secure a divorce, but that they would continue to live together, and, being moved by tears and threats, she accepted the arrangement. After that, she says, he asked a return of the note and mortgage to give her in lieu a deed of conveyance of the property. Thereafter he secured the return of the deed, and in lieu thereof he gave her a note for $5,000 and allows her $100 a month during her natural life. No children have been born to them, but they have one adopted daughter, Hdea. She asks for a divorce, the custody of the child, and an equitable division of the community property.

“Being moved by tears and threats, she accepted the arrangement.”

— Printed in The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1894
Then · 1894132 years apartNow · 2026

This case highlights the long-standing legal struggle of women in Washington to secure their share of community property during divorce. The mention of 'Boren’s Addition' and 'Maynard’s Addition' serves as a reminder that the foundational wealth of Seattle’s modern skyline—now some of the most expensive real estate in the country—was built on land claims tied to these 19th-century domestic legal battles.

The original page

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1894-05-19. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, MAY 19, 1894, Page 5
Text
Cleaned up from the page — spelling and layout repaired — not a word-for-word transcription. The page itself is above, for exact wording.
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.60323, -122.33028 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗