The Unmaking of Women’s Suffrage in Washington Territory
A Supreme Court ruling overturns the territory's suffrage law, branding the move an 'unconstitutional' legislative trick.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
The Supreme Court holds with Judge Nash that by the organic act of the Territory the term 'citizen,' as related to the elective franchise, is applicable only to males, and that the legislature overstepped its authority in bestowing the franchise upon women. The woman suffrage law is therefore declared unconstitutional and void. The soundness of this decision will not admit of dispute. From the date of its enactment, the woman suffrage law has been a subject of dissatisfaction and contempt to the great majority of the people in the Territory. By trickery, both political parties were trapped into an insincere and unwilling approval of the woman suffrage principle. The decision of the court will therefore be received with almost universal satisfaction. Woman suffrage has proven a practical failure in Washington Territory. It has accomplished nothing in the way of public or private good. There have been no moral, social or political reforms as a consequence of it. On the other hand, it has made dissension and trouble everywhere. After a fair trial, its most uncompromising opponents are among the women themselves. As a rule, modest and good women have not voted—at least not the second time—while vicious women and women of the coarser class have been vulgarly conspicuous at the polls. The rejection of this law takes Washington Territory from the 'queer list' and removes one of the important practical obstacles to the admission of the Territory into the Union.
“As a rule, modest and good women have not voted—at least not the second time—while vicious women and women of the coarser class have been vulgarly conspicuous at the polls.”
This 1888 editorial captures the volatile political atmosphere of Washington’s path to statehood, where women's voting rights were treated as a legislative bargaining chip. Today, the rhetoric regarding 'voter fraud' and 'outsider influence' echoes similar historical efforts to gatekeep the franchise based on perceived social status and moral policing.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.