The Power Struggle Over Pavement
Tacoma's city council faces internal deadlock as officials fight over who gets to countersign checks and which material should pave the city streets.
In the city council, the controller requested the council to reconsider a resolution requiring the controller to countersign all checks issuing from the treasurer's office. Mr. Clinton, of the finance committee, stated that it was a matter of great importance to the city to be compelled to look up the authority for every check before it goes to the bank, thereby reducing the duties of the treasurer to that of a clerk. The matter was brought to a head by the controller refusing to countersign a check which was placed before him this morning. He has taken the ground that he will not countersign any check if he cannot know the purpose for the expenditure. There was another wrangle over the payment of Pacific Avenue. A resolution of intention to pave again was passed a week ago, but today the matter was laid over one week, and the men who want a plank pavement say there is a 'job' to have an asphalt pavement substituted. However, there is a demand for fir block pavement, at least a trial, on the ground that if fir blocks prove satisfactory, the city can build up a trade in blocks for this purpose. C. P. Ferry, the 'Duke of Tacoma,' is the indefatigable champion of fir blocks.
“C. P. Ferry, the 'Duke of Tacoma,' is the indefatigable champion of fir blocks, and no matter in what part of the world he is traveling he usually sends a cable or two monthly to home papers in favor of 'fir block pavement'.”
Municipal infighting over budget oversight and public works contracts is a timeless feature of Seattle and Tacoma politics. The specific debate over 'fir block' versus asphalt reflects the era's experimentation with infrastructure, much like modern debates over green materials or street design.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.