The 'Crab Man' and the Brutal Reality of Frontier Discipline
A teenage girl escapes her abusive father only to be returned to his custody by a legal system that viewed children as the property of their parents.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
A case of wrong against which the law offers no protection came to the official notice of Prosecuting Attorney Ronald yesterday. Joe Jandin, a former bridge builder from the city on the Elliott Bay rail, was in search of his daughter, Barbara, aged 13, who had run away from home. These people are not unknown here, and are not new to the criminal scan. The father is known as the 'crab man,' and the daughter as the 'crab girl.' Several days ago, Jandin beat the girl most brutally with a strap and she ran off to old man Wetmore’s, three miles distant, where friendly shelter was given her. She came to town yesterday with the Wetmores, and Jandin came by train. He happened to see the girl, grabbed her, and took her to Mr. Ronald’s office, demanding that she be returned to him. The attorney stated that under our law he was entitled to the custody of the child, and they left the office. In a very few minutes the girl returned, having escaped from her father and showed Mr. Ronald two awful marks upon her leg and thigh where the strap had literally removed the skin, leaving the flesh raw. She stated most positively that she would not remain at home and sought some permanent residence, because she would run away at the next opportunity. The girl does not know what crime her father has committed and this may be used to explain his brutality. If she is returned, the matter was temporarily filed by allowing the girl to return home with the Wetmores.
“She showed Mr. Ronald two awful marks upon her leg and thigh where the strap had literally removed the skin, leaving the flesh raw.”
This 1888 account of a child seeking refuge from abuse—only to be forced back by a legal system focused on parental rights over child safety—highlights a dark precursor to modern debates about state intervention in domestic life. The 'law offering no protection' for vulnerable youth in the early frontier era remains a haunting parallel to current gaps in our modern social safety net.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.