The Unraveling of the Northern Pacific Rail Empire
A scathing critique of Henry Villard’s financial management and the 'banana belt' myths that promised prosperity to the Pacific Northwest.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
It is high time that the people of the Pacific Northwest, in justice to their section, should deny and rebuke the false assumptions and assertions regarding the loss of Mr. Villard's fortune. The press of the whole country has for a long time been flooded with claims that he was merely 'two years ahead of his time.' Official records flatly contradict these statements. While Mr. Villard attempted to play a gigantic deal in Wall Street, he got beaten at the game. Furthermore, it is not true that the railroad companies bore the weight of his losses; rather, they were borne down by him. He owed large sums to his companies without security upon his resignation—one of the gravest improprieties of which an officer of a corporation can be guilty. The ridicule heaped upon the 'great banana belt' has hindered development, and it is time for the truth to be told.
“Why not be honest and acknowledge that he tried to make a gigantic deal in Wall Street and got beaten at the game?”
Henry Villard’s rapid rise and spectacular collapse in the 1880s created a template for Pacific Northwest boom-and-bust cycles. This editorial reflects the intense local anger over how railroad speculation and 'boosterism' often left residents holding the bag while Wall Street tycoons moved on.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.