Same Streets
← All stories

The Pioneer Argument

An old timer writes in to dispute the recorded history of the first white child born in Washington Territory.

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

I recently noticed an article in the Pacific Christian Advocate, headed 'First Things in Washington Territory,' by Rev. J. P. Richmond. The reverend gentleman claims he and his family were the first full-blooded white settlers on Puget Sound, and that his son Francis was the first white child born in Washington Territory, west of the Rocky mountains. There is evidently some mystery connected with the history of the first white child in this Territory. In 1841, one of the party, Kerny by name, who crossed the plains and mountains with us, standing on the ground of what had been the old fort on the bank of the Spokane River, said, pointing to his son, 'This boy, Isadore, was born right here.' Furthermore, the doctor states that in 1843, Sir George Simpson arrived at Nisqually with seven or eight families of Scotch Canadians. The Doctor is mistaken; the date of their arrival was 1841, and there were seventeen families, not seven. I cannot account for the desire of the reverend gentleman to see an Indian in every family but his own, unless he had Indian on the brain. He fills two newspaper columns, but never gives us a word about his missionary work.

“I cannot account for the desire of the reverend gentleman to see an Indian in every family but his own, unless he had Indian on the brain.”

— Printed in Seattle Daily Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, W.T. [Wash.]) 1881-1888, 1884
Then · 1884142 years apartNow · 2026

Early Washington pioneers were obsessed with establishing their primacy in the historical record, a tendency that often involved minimizing the presence and contributions of Indigenous people or non-white families. Today, that same drive for historical legitimacy continues in Seattle as neighborhoods and communities debate who gets to claim the 'true' history of the city's founding.

The original page

Seattle Daily Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, W.T. [Wash.]) 1881-1888, 1884-03-09. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
Seattle Daily Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, W.T. [Wash.]) 1881-1888, MAR 9, 1884, Page 3
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.30340, -122.53300 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗