The Political Price of Railroad Favors
A Washington Territory legislator faces backlash for allegedly prioritizing railroad monopolies over public interests.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
Mr. O. H. Warner, of Whitman county, is mentioned in connection with the Democratic nomination for delegate. Mr. Warner was a member of the last House of Representatives, and voted for the bill prepared by the attorney of the Northern Pacific Railroad and lobbied through the legislature, taxing the gross earnings of the railroad in place of their property as individual citizens. Should Mr. Warner be the nominee of the Democratic party, he will have an uphill job to explain his vote on that nefarious measure. As a Democrat, it is hereby asserted, believing the party will sustain it, that Democrats want no candidate who has subserved any railroad monopoly in the slightest degree.
“Democrats want no candidate who has subserved any railroad monopoly in the slightest degree.”
Railroad influence in the late 19th century was the 'Big Tech' of its day—an industry so powerful it could reshape local laws. Today's Seattle battles over corporate influence and zoning policy echo these same tensions between public good and private monied interest.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.